Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended – A Review

bahnsen bookPresuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended
Greg Bahnsen
Joel McDurmon, editor

When I first learned about the publication of Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended by the late Greg Bahnsen, I quickly put it on my “get list.” American Vision had a sale last fall and this book was one of the discounted items and so I couldn’t pass it up.

The story behind the book is an unusual one.  Apparently, Bahnsen had prepared the manuscript for print and at some point either before or after his death, the only copy fell behind some cabinets in an office.  No one knew what happened to it, and so the potential book was forgotten.  Nearly 16 years later, however, when that old office was being moved, the long lost manuscript was finally found.

Joel McDurmon of American Vision ministries does the principle editing on the book, as well as writes a preface. Apart from some stylistic matters, he left the content as close to how Bahnsen had it before his death.

The book is broken into two major sections: Part one is called “Presuppositional Apologetics Positively Stated.” It is comprised of three chapters, an introduction, a study on the Christian mind and method, and an examination of neutrality and autonomy. The second section is a critique of three major personalities that Bahnsen claims are “incomplete” presuppositionalists, Gordon Clark, Edward J. Carnell, and Francis Schaeffer. According to McDurmon, a third section that provided a critique of non-presuppositional proponents was left unfinished, and thus was not included with this book. He suggests in the preface that the material may be worked up into a separate title.

I have to confess that having read the book, I was left a bit disappointed with it. I guess I was expecting much more than what it was. I mean, if this book is supposedly Bahnsen’s magnum opus, I was hoping for some soul-stirring material.

But regrettably, I found that reading it was dry and boring.  Honestly, and maybe it’s just me, but I thought it needed to be edited better. I thought a lot of the book was tedious at times, with the occasional use of long, run-on, verbose sentences.

For instance, consider this whopper from page 125 under section 9 “Ethical Perspectives of Reasoning:”

An ethical consideration, however, gives us a further reason why a Christian ought to use a presuppositional apologetic rather than attempting an uncommitted methodology that uses alleged commonly interpreted “facts” in order to build up a “proof” that any self-respecting, “rational man” can recognize as “very probably” pointing to the possibility of Christianity’s reasonableness (if not its truth).

Wowzers! After a few read throughs, I understand what he is saying, but isn’t there a better way to tighten that up? At least break it up into a couple of sentences?

Bahnsen also has the habit of using big fancy philosophizing words and concepts and leaves them undefined for the uninitiated. I’m all for using philosophical words and concepts; I want Christians some-what “educated” in the matters of philosophical worldviews.  However, it’s helpful to define and explain those concepts with better clarity and precision than what is offered in the overall book.  Because if you couple esoteric philosophical ideas with verbose sentences, you have the makings of a tranquilizing cocktail that will lull even the most erudite OPC minister into a dreamy stupor.

But those two complaints of mine doesn’t mean the book is unprofitable. Bahnsen does have some excellent things to say as to the theology behind a presuppositional approach, as well as his evaluation of autonomy and intellectual neutrality. Just be prepared to labor through the content and re-read sections to solidify what it is he is saying.

Additionally, Bahnsen’s critique of Gordon Clark’s philosophy, in which he demonstrates his inconsistent presuppositionalism, is an excellent study, especially for those who are familiar with the particulars of the classic Van Tillian/Clarkian feud. It is too bad, as McDurmon opines in the preface, that John Robbins isn’t still around to offer his evaluation of the chapter.

Over all the book is okay. I definitely do not want people to go away thinking I am dismissing it. Like I said, Bahnsen does have good things to say. Unfortunately, he says those things in such a way that it may be unattainable for those not versed in his “language” and that paints presuppositionalism in an unnecessary corner.

On a recent podcast, Joshua Whipps, who contributes to Choosing Hats, a blog devoted to presuppositional apologetics and methodology, complained that certain critiques of presuppositionalism are mistaken when they frame the apologetic as sitting in “ivory, academic towers.” In other words, presuppositionalists are erroneously viewed as out-of-touch with common folks and is a “theology” for sophisticated intellectuals rather than an evangelistic methodology that will win souls for Christ on the “street level.”  I too reject such charges as ignorant and unfounded.  However, Bahnsen’s book doesn’t help with alleviating those concerns. It should have.

If you are a student of apologetic theology/philosophy, Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended may be worth your investment, especially for the critique of Clark. Certainly there will be Bahnsen fanboys who will absolutely rave about it, but I think his massive book on Van Til is a much worthier candidate for the title of Bahnsen’s  magnum opus.  As an introduction to presuppositional theology and apologetics, I would recommend his classic work Always Ready.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended – A Review

  1. Fred,
    After wading completely through Van Til’s Apologetic, Readings and Analysis several years ago, and before that Bahnsen’s Always Ready, I concur. As a somewhat decidedly unfinished work (the chapters on the non-presuppositionalist proponents not included and/or finished), it may have been much better had these been included and Bahnsen been able to summarize and tie it all together. There are quite a number of gems, however.

    Having digested all of Schaeffer’s works in the early 80’s, and much like many others who came to understand presuppositional apologetics through Schaeffer and believed that his books and writings were one of the best distillations of the Judeo-Christian system of thought (still a huge fan), I found his section on the critique of Schaeffer quite illuminating.

    Bahnsen sees in Schaeffer something that now having read a number of Van Til’s works, and Bahnsen himself, goes to the heart of the presuppositional apologetic position: the self-attesting, self-authenticating character of Scripture (p.247). Bahnsen claims Schaeffer doesn’t start there.

    Overall, I considered Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended as supplemental to my earlier readings of his primer Always Ready and the much weightier Van Til’s Apologetic: Readings and Analysis, and for me, was seen in that light.

    Thanks for your review.
    Blessings

  2. Thanks for the review! I guess I’m too much of a Bahnsen fan-boy. I did enjoy this book largely for it’s critiques on the other guys especially the chapter on Gordon Clark. If I am correct, that chapter was the longest treatment by a Van Tillian on Clark’s apologetics. I believe it was American Vision that market this book as as Bahnsen’s magnum opus, though I think Van Til’s Apologetics is a better candidate for that.
    Shameless plug of my own review: http://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/book-recommendation-presuppositional-apologetics-stated-and-defended-by-greg-bahnsen/ ; though as I look at my review now and your review, I realized I left much out much of what I could have said.

  3. Pingback: Another Helping of Van Tillian Apologetics Links for Feb 2013 | The Domain for Truth

  4. Pingback: Articles on Apologetics and Evangelism | hipandthigh

  5. Pingback: Reviews | hipandthigh

  6. Pingback: Late February 2013 Presuppositional apologetics Links | The Domain for Truth

  7. Pingback: Books I heard or Read in 2013 | hipandthigh

Leave me a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s